Say we also implement librt.so.1.

Operating Systems / OSv - Nadav Har'El [cloudius-systems.com] - 29 May 2013 07:43 UTC

This is required, for example, by the Boost libraries (e.g., libboost_system-mt.so.1.50.0). The librt library isn't actually a separate library on modern Linux - rather all its traditional functions are now in glibc, and "librt" is merely a filter on glibc. So no reason not to say we support librt too.

Not to mention that we already implement a bunch of functions that traditionally resided in librt (nanosleep, sched_yield, sem_*, etc.

737f83e Say we also implement librt.so.1.
core/elf.cc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Upstream: github.com


  • Share